Injection volume showdown: can more fluid beat carpal tunnel pain?
NCT ID NCT07283874
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether injecting a larger or smaller amount of fluid around the median nerve in the wrist better relieves pain from carpal tunnel syndrome. 35 adults with mild to moderate carpal tunnel will receive either 8 ml or 3 ml of dextrose, or a steroid injection. The goal is to see if volume affects pain scores on a 0-10 scale.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- dextrose 5%, triamcinolone acetonide, lidocaine 2%
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could help doctors choose the best injection volume for carpal tunnel pain relief.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-phase study with only 35 people. It may not show a clear difference between volumes, and results may not apply to everyone with CTS.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 35 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Dec 2025
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients aged 20-80 years old 2. Patients diagnosed with idiopathic CTS. 3. Abnormal electrophysiological analysis showing mild to moderate CTS 4. Symptoms and signs including: 1. pain or paraesthesia in the median nerve innervated area (at least two digits with such symptoms between the thumb and the 4th digit) for more than 6 months not responding to conservative management including (vitamin B complex, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral steroids, and/or night splint) 2. positive Phalen test, Tinel sign, or flick sign 3. The patient's initial examination was based on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline recommendations prior to their inclusion and confirmed by nerve conduction studies Exclusion Criteria: * 1- Age less than 20 years 2- severe CTS (abductor policies brevis muscle atrophy with distal latency time \>6.5 MS). 3- MN electrophysiology study revealing absent potentials. 4- its cross-sectional area (CSA) \>15 mm2 by sonographic checkup. 5- previous surgery of carpal tunnel. 6- previous wrist injection within 3 months 7- history of peripheral nerve injuries (brachial plexopathy, cervical radiculopathy or thoracic outlet syndrome) 8- CTS due to systemic causes, for example, endocrinal and/or pregnancy, rheumatoid arthritis, gouty or psoriatic osteoarthritis. 9- concurrent use of antihistaminic, or cortisone. 10- Participant refusal. 11- local infection. presence of coagulopathy, and/or allergy to the included medications were also points for patients' exclusion from the study
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Three shots, one wrist: which injection best eases carpal tunnel?
- Scalpel vs sound waves: two carpal tunnel surgeries go head to head
- Can carpal tunnel surgery restore more than hand function?
- Does nerve healing keep pace with hand recovery after carpal tunnel surgery?
- Retraining the brain to ease carpal tunnel pain: a new approach put to the test
- Can a Two-Session acupuncture treatment match ten sessions for carpal tunnel?