Breathing battle: biofeedback vs. retraining for vocal cord trouble
NCT ID NCT05770518
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two non-drug treatments for paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM), a condition where vocal cords close when they should open, causing shortness of breath. Fifty-one adults were randomly assigned to either biofeedback (watching their breathing on a screen) or laryngeal control therapy (learning relaxation and breathing techniques). Researchers measured symptom changes using a breathing difficulty questionnaire to see which approach works better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- biofeedback and laryngeal control therapy
- What this could lead to
- If this works, it could point toward a more effective, non-drug treatment for breathing difficulties caused by vocal cord dysfunction.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small pilot study with only 51 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The treatments are behavioral and may not work for all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
51 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2023
- Finished
-
Jul 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Men and women aged 18 or older * Referral to the Washington University School of Medicine Voice and Airway Center for concerns for PVFM * Pre-treatment Dyspnea Index score of 11 or higher (representing the threshold for having an abnormal score) * Answer yes to the following questions: "Do you sometimes have difficulty breathing?" and "When you have difficulty breathing, is it worse when inhaling (breathing in)?" Exclusion Criteria: * Inability to speak or understand English * Previous treatment of PVFM * History of laryngeal surgery * Evidence of alternative laryngeal pathology (e.g. subglottic stenosis, benign or malignant obstructive mass) on flexible laryngoscopy as performed as part of routine clinical care
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Paradoxical vocal fold motion are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Retraining the mind to open the airways: CBT takes on vocal cord dysfunction
- Ultrasound may replace scopes for Kids' vocal cord checks
- Can video games help you find your voice? VR therapy trial launches
- Scientists use wearable sensors to decode mysterious exercise breathing disorder
- Hidden breathing blockage found in severe asthma patients