Which drainage method is easier on patients? new study compares two procedures
NCT ID NCT04857424
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 121 patients with blocked bile ducts (biliary obstruction) to see which drainage method—endoscopic (through a scope) or percutaneous (through the skin)—led to a better quality of life. Researchers measured changes in mobility, self-care, pain, and anxiety. The goal is to help doctors choose the procedure that causes less discomfort and improves daily living.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- drainage procedure (endoscopic or percutaneous)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors choose the drainage method that best preserves patients' quality of life.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed observational study, not a treatment trial. It compares existing procedures, so it won't introduce a new therapy. Results may not apply to all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
121 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2021
- Finished
-
Mar 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Adult patients aged 18 or over with a diagnosis of benign or malignant biliary obstruction who have underwent an ERCP and/or PTBD will be identified through Best Practices Advisory (BPA), referrals from the clinics of GI consultants and the gastroenterology department procedure schedules at Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with benign biliary obstruction * Patients with malignant biliary obstruction * Patients undergoing ERCP and/or PTBD Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with gallstone disease * Patients who will undergo ERCP who have previously underwent a PTBD * Patients who will undergo PTBD who have previously underwent an ERCP * Female patients who are pregnant * Prisoners and other vulnerable populations
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Biliary obstruction are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New device aims to make pancreatic and bile duct procedures safer
- Dissolving stent could unblock bile ducts without extra surgery
- Which sedation works best for bile duct procedures? new study aims to find out
- Which stent is best for unblocking bile ducts in cancer patients?
- Extra fluids during ERCP may prevent pancreatitis, study finds
- New approach: antibiotics delivered straight to the infection site during ERCP