Smart reports guide doctors to better antibiotic choices
NCT ID NCT06027593
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether giving doctors automated reports on their antibiotic prescribing habits could improve how often they follow official guidelines. Researchers looked at over 26,000 patients with pneumonia, ear infections, or sore throat. They compared antibiotic use before and after doctors received the reports and education. The goal was to see if this simple feedback tool could reduce unnecessary or incorrect antibiotic prescriptions.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- audit and feedback reports on antibiotic use
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this approach could help doctors prescribe antibiotics more appropriately, reducing unnecessary use and fighting antibiotic resistance.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational quality-improvement study, not a controlled trial, so results may not prove cause and effect. The intervention is simple education and feedback, which may not change long-term prescribing habits.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
26,139 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2022
- Finished
-
Jul 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Patient Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of one of four conditions based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes. Patient Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of specific complex chronic conditions * Use of immunocompromising medications * Transfer from another health facility. Clinician Inclusion Criteria: * Prescribing clinicians (including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) at one of the participating outpatient practices or inpatient units. * Age ≥ 18 years old * Employed by one of the participating sites Clinician Exclusion Criteria: * Volunteers or other non-employee hospital staff * Limited English proficiency
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute otitis media are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
-
University of Pennsylvania Health System
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Blood test vs. clinical check: which safely cuts antibiotic use in pneumonia?
- Herbal drops aim to melt away sore throat pain
- Flu vaccine showdown: which shot protects seniors best?
- Can inhaled nitric oxide speed pneumonia recovery?
- Herbal granules may knock out cold symptoms in three days — a rigorous trial puts them to the test
- Numbing ear drops could ease children's ear infection pain faster