Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which anesthesia helps stroke patients recover faster?

NCT ID NCT06183567

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at whether a lighter sedation (sedoanalgesia) or full general anesthesia leads to better early recovery in people having emergency clot removal after a stroke. Researchers will track 62 patients' neurological scores and vital signs during and after the procedure. The goal is to see which method is safer and supports faster improvement.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If it works, this could point toward better anesthesia choices for stroke patients, potentially improving early recovery after clot removal.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 62 participants, so results may not apply to all stroke patients. It compares two procedures, not a new drug or cure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 62 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Nov 2023

Expected to finish

Jul 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

A government agency

The lead sponsor is a government body.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 80 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Presence of cerebral ischemic embolism within the first 6 hours 2. ASA 1-4 3. Body mass index below 30 kg m-2 4. NIHSS score ≥ 10 5. Presence of isolated/combined occlusion at any level of the anterior circulation internal carotid or middle cerebral artery Exclusion Criteria: * Chronic renal failure * EF less than 40 * Presence of intracranial hemorrhage * Previous known history of severe neurological disease * Presence of bleeding diathesis * Pre-procedure GCS ≤ 8 and intubated patients * Failure to clearly show the site of vascular occlusion on diagnostic imaging results * Clinical or imaging evidence of vascular occlusion that is not internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery * Absence of gag reflex, loss of airway protective reflex, inadequate saliva swallowing * History of lung infection, advanced COPD or respiratory failure * Known history of aspiration due to vomiting, * Known history of difficult airway * In the presence of known intolerance or allergy to certain drugs for sedation, analgesia or both * Previously known carotid artery stenosis * Pregnant patients * Patients without consent

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anesthesia are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

ischemic stroke Neurologic Manifestations

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Umraniye Education and Research Hospital

    Istanbul, Umraniye, 34734, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.