Which patch keeps the carotid artery open longer?
NCT ID NCT01184183
First seen Aug 18, 2026 · Last updated Aug 19, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two types of patches used to close the artery after carotid endarterectomy, a surgery that removes blockages in the neck artery to prevent stroke. The Accuseal patch, a newer synthetic option, is tested against the Bovine Pericardial patch, which has been used for decades. The goal is to see which patch better reduces bleeding during surgery, lowers the risk of stroke, and prevents the artery from narrowing again over time. The study includes patients with significant carotid artery narrowing, whether they have had symptoms or not.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Two surgical patches used to close the artery after carotid endarterectomy: the Accuseal patch (a synthetic material) and the Bovine Pericardial patch (made from cow tissue).
- What this could lead to
- If the Accuseal patch works better, it could reduce the risk of stroke and keep the carotid artery open longer after surgery, improving long-term outcomes for patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center trial with 200 patients, so results may not apply broadly. The Accuseal patch might have a longer bleeding time, and long-term benefits are not yet proven.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
200 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2009
- Finished
-
Jan 2012
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
The population includes Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA), surgical removal of the blockage in the neck artery patients.
- Ages
-
18 to 90 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Symptomatic patients with \>50% stenosis or Asymptomatic patients \>60% stenosis: i.e.: patients experiencing a neurological event(s) such as a trans-ischemic attack, cerebrovascular accident, amaurosis fugax, and/or a preoperative duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiogram, or Angiogram indicative of severe \> 60% carotid artery stenosis. Exclusion Criteria: * will be enforced for those less than 18 years of age, patients who for religious reasons can not accept a Bovine Pericardial patch and those with a combined procedure ie: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and CEA.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Carotid artery stenosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Vascular Center of Excellence
Charleston, West Virginia, 25304, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which heart stent works best? basel registry tracks Real-World outcomes
- Do complex heart procedures expose patients to more harmful radiation and contrast?
- Can a dissolving stent coating beat a permanent one for blocked arteries?
- Can a new CT scanner see carotid plaques better?
- Could an arthritis drug shield heart and kidneys in metabolic syndrome?
- Could a double-barrel cholesterol drug shrink artery plaque better than statins alone?