Can a crown save a decayed baby tooth better than pulling it?
NCT ID NCT07719478
First seen Jul 22, 2026 · Last updated Jul 23, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two ways to handle severely decayed front baby teeth in children aged 3 to 5: restoring them with zirconia crowns or simply extracting them. Researchers want to see which approach leads to better quality of life, parental satisfaction, child self-image, and speech development. The goal is to provide clearer evidence for dentists and families facing this common childhood dental problem.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- zirconia crown restoration or extraction of primary anterior teeth
- What this could lead to
- If zirconia crowns prove better than extraction, this could offer a way to preserve baby teeth, potentially improving children's quality of life, self-esteem, and speech development.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, non-randomised study, so results may not apply broadly. Crowns require general anaesthesia and may still fail, requiring later extraction.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 60 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
3 to 5 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Children aged 3-5 years * Presence of one or more decayed primary anterior teeth * Written informed consent from parent or legal guardian Exclusion Criteria: * Craniofacial anomalies or genetic syndromes * Diagnosed developmental delay or speech disorders * Previous speech therapy * Systemic disease contraindicating general anaesthesia
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Early childhood caries (ECC) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a simple WhatsApp nudge cut childhood tooth decay?
- A Child's saliva may hold the secret to cavity risk
- One shade fits all? new tooth filling aims to match any Child's tooth color
- Portugal study reveals hidden impact of tiny teeth troubles on preschoolers
- Midwives' views on teeth: a new survey could shape future dental advice
- Parent training may help stop baby tooth decay before it starts