VR headset vs. dummy: which trains future doctors better for ECT?

NCT ID NCT07350278

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 11, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study compares virtual reality (VR) simulation to traditional mannequin-based training for teaching medical students how to perform electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). 78 medical students with no prior ECT training will be randomly assigned to practice with either a VR simulator or a mannequin. The goal is to see if VR training is as effective as the standard method for building ECT skills.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Virtual reality simulation
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that VR is a practical and effective tool for training medical students in ECT, potentially reducing costs and increasing access to training.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage educational study (78 participants) that only measures skill acquisition in a controlled setting, not real patient outcomes. The VR training may not translate to better real-world performance.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    RECRUITING

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.