Which tool is faster for inserting a breathing tube? new study compares two devices
NCT ID NCT07555535
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This completed study compared two devices used to place a breathing tube during kidney stone surgery: a videolaryngoscope and a VideoLMA. Researchers measured how long each took and how often they worked on the first try. The trial involved 100 adults and aimed to find which device might be better for airway management.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AIRWAY MANAGEMENT are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Etlik city hospital
Yenimahalle, Ankara, 06000, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can AI read ultrasound to ensure a clear airway?
- A simple ultrasound test might predict who suffers most from stent pain
- Can a camera guide safer breathing tubes during endoscopy?
- Can a simple tool predict who will be Stone-Free after kidney surgery?
- Could a single device make emergency intubation faster and safer?
- Can a nasal cannula outperform a face mask in keeping patients oxygenated during emergency intubation?