Which IV drug tames a racing heart in AFib faster? a Head-to-Head trial
NCT ID NCT07706075
First seen Jul 15, 2026 · Last updated Aug 04, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This trial compares two standard IV medicines—verapamil and metoprolol—to see which controls rapid heart rate better in adults with atrial fibrillation who are otherwise stable. Patients receive one of the drugs in the emergency department, and their heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen levels are monitored for 30 minutes. The goal is to find which drug works faster and more safely, helping doctors make evidence-based choices.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- intravenous verapamil or intravenous metoprolol
- What this could lead to
- If one drug works faster or more safely, it could help doctors choose the best treatment for atrial fibrillation with rapid heart rate in the emergency room.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center trial, so results may not apply to all patients. Both drugs can cause low blood pressure or slow heart rate.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 120 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jan 2027
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients aged 18 years and above presenting to the Emergency Department * Confirmed diagnosis of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (heart rate ≥110 bpm) on 12-lead ECG * Hemodynamically stable at the time of enrollment (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, no shock, no acute pulmonary edema) * Willingness to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Hemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, or acute decompensated heart failure * Known pre-excitation syndrome (e.g., Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) on baseline ECG * Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction less than 30%) as determined by echocardiography * Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to verapamil or metoprolol * Patients already taking rate control agents (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or digoxin) in the last 24 hours * Major bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 bpm) or AV block (second or third degree) on baseline ECG * Active bronchospasm or severe obstruction of pulmonary disease * Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C) or acute renal failure (eGFR \<15 mL/min/1.73 m²) * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Inability to give informed consent
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Atrial fibrillation (AF) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Evaluation of the factors associated with bradtycardia following pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation
- Can remote exercise sessions boost heart recovery after ablation?
- Can a heart drug keep atrial fibrillation at bay after ablation?
- Can a new drug stop long atrial fibrillation episodes?
- Which ablation method best stops atrial fibrillation from returning?
- Your phone's camera might spot a hidden heart rhythm problem