C-Section incision showdown: which cut heals better?

NCT ID NCT06620432

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of uterine incisions (high vs low) during a first cesarean section to see which leads to fewer scar defects. 168 pregnant women having their first C-section will be randomly assigned to one of four groups, combining incision type with a stitching technique. Participants will have an ultrasound 6-16 weeks after surgery to check for defects in the uterine wall.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If it works, this could help doctors choose the best incision type to reduce uterine scar defects after a first C-section.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study (168 participants) comparing surgical techniques, not testing a new drug. Results may not apply to all women or change practice immediately.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PLACENTA ACCRETA SPECTRUM are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

placenta accreta

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

PLACENTA ACCRETA SPECTRUM

Contacts and locations

Locations

Fundación Valle del Lili
RECRUITING

Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, 760032, Colombia

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.