Tiny incision, big relief? study tests Ultrasound-Guided carpal tunnel release
NCT ID NCT04504019
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two types of carpal tunnel release surgery: one using ultrasound guidance with a tiny incision (less than 1 cm) and the traditional mini-open method with a slightly larger cut. Forty-one adults with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. Researchers tracked symptoms, hand strength, pain, and recovery time over 24 months to see if the ultrasound-guided approach works just as well and allows a quicker return to daily activities.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- SX-One MicroKnife (UltraGuideCTR) for ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release is as effective as traditional surgery, with a smaller incision and possibly faster recovery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-site trial with only 41 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The ultrasound-guided technique is still relatively new, and long-term outcomes beyond 24 months are not studied.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARPAL TUNNEL are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.