Ultrasound vs. catheter: which better spots hidden fluid loss?
NCT ID NCT07206732
First seen Nov 01, 2025 · Last updated May 10, 2026 · Updated 22 times
Summary
This study will enroll 80 adults in the emergency department who are in shock from blood loss, infection, or bleeding. Researchers will compare two ways to detect low blood volume: an ultrasound of the inferior vena cava (a large vein) versus a standard pressure monitoring catheter. The goal is to see which method is more accurate and helpful for guiding fluid treatment.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SHOCK are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Emeregency medicine department ,Assiut University
Asyut, Sahel Selim, Egypt
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.