Which nerve zap boosts grip strength more? new study compares two techniques.

NCT ID NCT07098130

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Universidad de Zaragoza Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested two different ultrasound-guided nerve stimulation protocols on 86 healthy adults to see which better improves handgrip strength. Participants received a single session of either high-frequency (100 Hz) or low-frequency (10 Hz) stimulation to the median nerve. The goal is to learn which settings might be best for rehabilitation and athletic training.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: percutaneous neuromodulation (electrical stimulation via needle)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could help physiotherapists choose the best nerve stimulation settings to improve muscle strength and recovery.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study in healthy people, so results may not apply to patients with injuries or conditions. The effect on handgrip strength may be small or temporary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEALTHY PARTICIPANTS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

HEALTHY PARTICIPANTS

Contacts and locations

Locations

University of Zaragoza

Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50009, Spain

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.