Could a belly ultrasound replace the internal one for preterm labor risk?

NCT ID NCT04341597

First seen Jun 26, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study tested whether a noninvasive ultrasound done on the outside of the perineum (transperineal) can accurately measure cervical length in pregnant women, compared to the standard internal (endovaginal) method. Researchers enrolled 85 women in their second or third trimester who needed a cervical ultrasound. Each woman received both types of ultrasound by different operators, and the measurements were compared to see if the external method could reliably detect a short cervix, which is a risk factor for preterm labor.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
transperineal ultrasound
What this could lead to
If successful, this could offer a less invasive alternative to the standard endovaginal ultrasound for checking cervical length, making the exam more comfortable for pregnant women.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study (85 participants) comparing two imaging methods, not testing a treatment. The transperineal technique may not be as accurate as the gold standard in all cases.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for TRANSPERINEAL are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU Amiens

    Amiens, 80480, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.