Arteries vs veins: which graft keeps hearts beating longer?

NCT ID NCT07057713

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two surgical techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). One uses only arteries (total arterial grafting), while the other uses a mix of artery and vein grafts (conventional mixed grafting). The goal is to see which approach keeps grafts open longer and reduces heart complications. About 400 adults with multivessel coronary artery disease will take part, and their grafts will be checked after 12 months.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using either total arterial grafts (internal thoracic and radial arteries) or mixed grafts (internal thoracic and saphenous vein)
What this could lead to
If total arterial grafting proves better, it could lead to longer-lasting bypass grafts and fewer future heart problems for people with coronary artery disease.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center trial with 400 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. The study only follows patients for 12 months, and long-term benefits are unknown.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARTERIAL GRAFT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • The Second Hospital of Jilin University

    Changchun, Jilin, 130000, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.