Which filling lasts longest? new study tests three materials for tooth repair

NCT ID NCT06375837

Ongoing Disease control Sponsor: Hacettepe University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares three types of dental filling materials for repairing non-carious cervical lesions (tooth damage not caused by cavities). Thirty-three adults with at least three such lesions will receive each material in different teeth. Over two years, dentists will rate how well each filling looks and functions. The goal is to find which material performs best.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: dental restorative materials (alkasite-based, hybrid resin composite, flowable resin composite)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could identify which dental material works best for repairing tooth lesions, improving long-term dental restoration choices.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage trial with only 33 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The materials may perform differently in real-world use.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for TOOTH DISEASES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

tooth disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

TOOTH DISEASES

Contacts and locations

Locations

Hacettepe University

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.