Which filling lasts longest? new study tests three materials for tooth repair

NCT ID NCT06375837

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares three types of dental filling materials for repairing non-carious cervical lesions (tooth damage not caused by cavities). Thirty-three adults with at least three such lesions will receive each material in different teeth. Over two years, dentists will rate how well each filling looks and functions. The goal is to find which material performs best.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

dental restorative materials (alkasite-based, hybrid resin composite, flowable resin composite)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could identify which dental material works best for repairing tooth lesions, improving long-term dental restoration choices.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage trial with only 33 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The materials may perform differently in real-world use.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for TOOTH DISEASES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

tooth disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hacettepe University

    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)