Tabata vs fartlek: which training boosts football performance?

NCT ID NCT07331649

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two types of interval training—modified Tabata and fartlek—in 34 amateur male football players aged 18-25. Over 6 weeks, players did either Tabata (short bursts of exercise with rest) or fartlek (varying speeds) three times a week. Researchers measured leg strength, jumping power, and endurance before and after training to see which method worked better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
exercise training programs (modified Tabata training and fartlek training)
What this could lead to
If one training method proves superior, it could help amateur football players improve strength, power, and endurance more efficiently.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study with only 34 participants, so results may not apply to all players. The training programs are short (6 weeks), so long-term benefits are unknown.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Al Mussadiq Institute of Higher Education

    Kharian, Punjab Province, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.