Stitching showdown: which method keeps surgical wounds closed best?

NCT ID NCT07241507

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 80 adults who had abdominal surgery to see if the way doctors stitch the wound affects healing. One group got continuous sutures (one long thread) and the other got interrupted sutures (many separate stitches). The goal was to see which method leads to fewer wound infections or wound reopening. Patients were followed for four weeks after surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

suturing technique (continuous vs interrupted)

What this could lead to

If one method proves better, surgeons may adopt it to reduce wound reopening and infection after abdominal surgery.

What could go wrong

This is a small, single-center study with only 80 patients, so results may not apply to all hospitals or patient groups.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LAPAROTOMY CLOSURE AFTER ABDOMINAL SURGERY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Surgical Wound Infection

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Allama Iqbal Teaching Hospital, Dera Ghazi Khan

    Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab Province, 32200, Pakistan