Stitches or staples? small study aims to settle the debate for leg fracture surgery

NCT ID NCT06586814

Ongoing Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of Southern California Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This pilot study tests whether stitches or staples are better for closing surgical wounds after fixing broken leg bones. About 50 adults with certain leg fractures will be randomly assigned to one closure method. The main goal is to see if such a study is practical, not to prove which method is best.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: sutures and staples
What this could lead to: If successful, this study could show which wound closure method leads to fewer infections after orthopedic trauma surgery.
What could go wrong: This is a small pilot study with only 50 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It focuses on feasibility, not definitive outcomes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LOWER EXTREMITY FRACTURE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

tibia fracture

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

LOWER EXTREMITY FRACTURE

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Locations

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.