New device may improve treatment for dangerous lung clots
NCT ID NCT05684796
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 19, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tested whether adding a mechanical clot-removal device (Indigo Aspiration System) to standard blood thinners is safer and more effective than blood thinners alone for people with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (a serious blood clot in the lung). About 100 adults aged 18-80 with confirmed clots in major lung arteries participated. The main goal was to see if the combination treatment improved heart strain and reduced complications within 48 hours.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
100 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Nov 2023
- Finished
-
Sep 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18-80 years old 2. Clinical signs and symptoms consistent with acute PE with duration of 14 days or less 3. Objectively confirmed acute PE, based on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) imaging showing a filling defect in at least one main or proximal lobar pulmonary artery 4. Classification of intermediate high-risk PE as demonstrated by right ventricular dysfunction with RV/LV ratio ≥1.0 on CTPA and elevated cardiac biomarkers, including cardiac troponin, BNP, and/or NT-pro BNP above the upper limit of normal 5. Jugular or femoral access deemed suitable to accommodate pulmonary artery intervention with the Indigo Aspiration System 6. Informed consent is obtained from either the patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Administration of thrombolytic agents or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist within 30 days prior to baseline imaging 2. Hemodynamic instability with any of the following present: 1. Cardiac arrest 2. Obstructive shock or persistent hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) \<90 mmHg or an acute drop in systolic BP ≥40 mmHg for \>15 min, or requiring vasopressor or inotropic support to achieve a systolic BP ≥90 mmHg 3. Patients on ECMO 4. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 ≥9 5. History, imaging or hemodynamic findings consistent with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) diagnosis 6. Imaging evidence or other evidence that suggests, in the opinion of the Investigator, that catheter-based intervention is not appropriate for the patient 7. Allergy, hypersensitivity, or heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) 8. Contraindication or sensitivity to iodinated intravascular contrast that cannot be adequately premedicated 9. \<45 mL/min creatinine clearance 10. Severe active infection (e.g. sepsis) requiring treatment at time of enrollment 11. Active bleeding or disorders contraindicating anticoagulant therapy 12. Hemoglobin \<10 g/dL 13. Platelets \<100,000/μL 14. INR \>3 15. Cardiovascular or pulmonary surgery within last 7 days 16. Primary brain or metastatic brain cancer 17. Life expectancy \<90 days 18. Pregnancy 19. Intracardiac thrombus (right atrium, right ventricle clot in transit) or thrombus in the inferior vena cava identified on baseline imaging 20. Current participation in another investigational drug or device trial that may confound the results of this trial. Studies requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational but have since become commercially available are not considered investigational studies. 21. Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, precludes the patient from appropriate consent, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the trial, including compliance with follow-up requirements, or that could impact the scientific integrity of the trial
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Pulmonary embolism acute are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
-
Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, New Zealand
-
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75226, United States
-
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
-
Cooper Health System
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
-
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
-
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
-
Joseph Maxwell Cleland Atlanta VA Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
-
Kingwood Medical Center
Kingwood, Texas, 77339, United States
-
Krakowski Szpital Specjalistyczny św. Jana Pawła II
Krakow, Poland
-
McLaren Bay Heart & Vascular
Bay City, Michigan, 48708, United States
-
Metropolitan Methodist Hospital
San Antonio, Texas, 78212, United States
-
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 10029, United States
-
Northwestern Memorial
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
-
Radiology and Imaging Specialists/Lakeland Regional
Lakeland, Florida, 33801, United States
-
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
-
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
-
St. Elizabeth Edgewood Hospital
Edgewood, Kentucky, 41017, United States
-
The University of Arizona - Banner
Tucson, Arizona, 85719, United States
-
UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90024, United States
-
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
-
Wellstar Kennestone
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can half the Clot-Busting drug save lives with less bleeding?
- AI plus ultrasound could catch heart and lung decline before it turns critical
- Can a Clot-Removing device ease acute pulmonary embolism?
- Can a catheter device clear lung clots and ease heart strain?
- Which blood thinner is safer for lung clots? a Head-to-Head test
- Can a simple electrical scan spot dangerous lung clots without radiation?