Please sign in to follow a disease.
Can half the Clot-Busting drug save lives with less bleeding?
NCT ID NCT07816978
First seen Sep 14, 2026 · Last updated Sep 18, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
Researchers are testing whether a lower dose of the clot-dissolving drug alteplase can treat life-threatening pulmonary embolism as effectively as the standard full dose while causing less severe bleeding. The trial enrolls adults with acute high-risk pulmonary embolism, a condition where a clot blocks blood flow to the lungs. Participants receive either reduced-dose or full-dose alteplase and are followed for up to a year to compare survival, clot recurrence, and major bleeding.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- alteplase, a clot-dissolving drug given intravenously
- What this could lead to
- If reduced-dose alteplase works as well as the full dose, doctors could treat life-threatening pulmonary embolism with less bleeding risk.
- What could go wrong
- The lower dose might not break up clots fast enough in critically ill patients, and bleeding remains a risk with any thrombolysis. Results may not apply to all patients with pulmonary embolism.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 400 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2031
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Participant aged 18 years or older. 2. Acute pulmonary embolism verified by computed tomography pulmonary angiography or pulmonary angiography. In hemodynamically unstable participants unable to undergo immediate imaging, presumed pulmonary embolism may be diagnosed based on bedside echocardiographic findings consistent with acute right ventricular pressure overload and high clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism, provided that alternative causes of hemodynamic instability have been reasonably excluded. In such cases, the treating clinician must have independently decided to initiate thrombolytic therapy irrespective of study participation, and confirmatory imaging demonstrating pulmonary embolism must be performed as soon as clinically feasible. 3. High risk for early death, defined by at least one of the following: 1. High-risk pulmonary embolism according to European Society of Cardiology criteria: * Cardiac arrest with return of spontaneous circulation; * Obstructive shock, defined as systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or use of vasopressors to maintain systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg despite adequate filling status, together with end-organ hypoperfusion such as elevated serum lactate \>2 mmol/L, altered mental status, or cold clammy skin; * Persistent hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or a drop in systolic blood pressure ≥40 mmHg for longer than 15 minutes, not caused by new-onset arrhythmia, hypovolemia, or sepsis. 2. Abnormal right ventricular function on echocardiography or computed tomography pulmonary angiography, defined as right ventricular/left ventricular ratio ≥1.0, and elevated cardiac troponin above the local upper reference limit, and acute respiratory failure not primarily caused by underlying lung disease, defined as requiring facemask oxygen supplementation ≥12 L/min, high-flow nasal oxygen, or non-invasive ventilation with FiO2 ≥60% to reach oxygen saturation ≥94%. 4. Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Catastrophic pulmonary embolism, defined as ongoing cardiac arrest and/or need for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or immediate VA-ECMO as judged by the treating physicians. 2. Known hypersensitivity to alteplase or any of its excipients. 3. Contraindication to systemic thrombolysis with one or more of the following: * History of hemorrhagic stroke; * Ischemic stroke within the previous 6 months; * Central nervous system neoplasm; * Major trauma, major surgery, or major head injury within the previous 3 weeks; * Active life-threatening bleeding, bleeding into a critical organ or area, or known severe bleeding diathesis; * Chronic use of full-dose oral or parenteral anticoagulation before presentation. 4. The participant has already received reperfusion treatment for the index pulmonary embolism before randomization, including systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, or catheter-directed intervention. 5. Pregnancy. 6. Current participation in another study that would interfere with participation in this trial. 7. Any other condition that would put the participant at unacceptable risk from the trial interventions as judged by the treating clinician. 8. In countries where required by national regulations: lack of affiliation to a social security system or equivalent health insurance coverage.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Pulmonary embolism acute are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
23 sites in 3 countries. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Akershus University Hospital
Lörenskog, 1478, Norway
-
Capio S:t Göran's Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
-
Danderyd Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
-
Drammen Hospital
Drammen, 3004, Norway
-
Falun Hospital
Falun, Sweden
-
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, 5021, Norway
-
Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge
Stockholm, Sweden
-
Karolinska University Hospital, Solna
Stockholm, Sweden
-
Norrtälje Hospital
Norrtälje, Sweden
-
Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål
Oslo, 0450, Norway
-
Ostfold Hisptal
Grålum, 1714, Norway
-
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
-
Ryhov County Hospital
Jönköping, Sweden
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, Västra Götaland County, 413 45, Sweden
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal
Mölndal, Sweden
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra
Gothenburg, Sweden
-
Skaraborgs Hospital Skövde
Skövde, Sweden
-
Skåne University Hospital, Lund
Lund, Sweden
-
Skåne University Hospital, Malmö
Malmö, Sweden
-
Stavanger University Hospital
Stavanger, 4021, Norway
-
Södersjukhuset, Stockholm South General Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
-
University Hospital of Umeå
Umeå, Sweden
-
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, Sweden
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- AI plus ultrasound could catch heart and lung decline before it turns critical
- Can a Clot-Removing device ease acute pulmonary embolism?
- Can a catheter device clear lung clots and ease heart strain?
- Which blood thinner is safer for lung clots? a Head-to-Head test
- Can a simple electrical scan spot dangerous lung clots without radiation?
- New suction device aims to quickly clear lung clots in emergency setting