Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which anesthesia is safer for dangerous placenta condition? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07406841

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Gaziantep City Hospital Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

Placenta accreta is a serious pregnancy problem where the placenta grows too deeply into the womb, raising risks of heavy bleeding and other complications during C-section. This study looks back at the records of 50 women to compare spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia, focusing on blood loss, need for medications, and newborn health scores. The goal is to see if one method leads to better outcomes for both mother and baby.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If the results show one anesthesia method is safer, it could help doctors choose the best approach for mothers with placenta accreta, potentially reducing complications.
What could go wrong
This is a small, retrospective study that only looks back at medical records, so it cannot prove cause and effect. The findings may not apply to all hospitals or patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 50 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Feb 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Mar 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

The study population consists of pregnant women diagnosed with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) who underwent elective cesarean delivery at Gaziantep City Hospital. Participants were identified retrospectively from hospital medical records and anesthesia charts. Only patients with singleton pregnancies and complete perioperative and neonatal data were included in the analysis. The population reflects routine clinical practice in the management of PAS at a tertiary care center.

Ages

18 to 45 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Pregnant patients diagnosed with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), Undergoing elective cesarean delivery, Receiving either spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia during cesarean section, Singleton pregnancy, Availability of complete medical and anesthesia records related to surgery and perioperative management Exclusion Criteria: Patients without a diagnosis of PAS, Emergency (non-elective) cesarean deliveries, Use of anesthesia techniques other than spinal or general anesthesia, Multiple pregnancy (twins or more) ,Incomplete or missing medical/anesthesia records, Missing key perioperative or neonatal outcome data

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Placenta accreta spectrum are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

placenta accreta

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Placenta accreta spectrum

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.