Less invasive shoulder surgery could match standard procedure for active patients
NCT ID NCT07715162
First seen Jul 20, 2026 · Last updated Jul 23, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This trial compares two surgical techniques for people with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and mild (subcritical) bone loss. One is the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure, which uses a bone graft to restore the shoulder socket. The other is dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS), a less invasive method that reroutes a tendon to stabilize the joint. The study will measure quality of life and function over 24 months to see if DAS offers similar results with fewer complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- two surgical procedures: dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) and the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure
- What this could lead to
- If DAS proves as effective as the Latarjet procedure, it could offer a less invasive surgical option with fewer complications for people with recurrent shoulder instability and mild bone loss.
- What could go wrong
- This is a relatively small trial (84 participants), and the results may not apply to all patients. Both surgeries carry risks like infection, nerve damage, or recurrence of instability.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 84 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Nov 2030
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * aged 18 or older * with symptomatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability indicating the need for surgical stabilization * whose glenoid bone loss must be classified as subcritical, approximately between 13.5% and 20%, according to the criteria defined in the protocol * with HAGL lesions * with bone lesions * capable of providing informed consent and complying with the planned 24-month follow-up Exclusion Criteria: * with glenoid bone loss exceeding 20% * with a clear indication for another procedure not covered by the protocol (particularly if routine bone grafting is required and incompatible with the study) * with a history of bone stabilization of the affected shoulder * with a transfixing rotator cuff tear or a neurological condition impairing shoulder function * unable to guarantee adequate follow-up * under legal guardianship (curatorship, guardianship, or judicial protection) * deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative order * receiving psychiatric care * not enrolled in a social security program
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anterior shoulder instability are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.