Could one month of blood thinners be enough after a heart attack stent?
NCT ID NCT03971500
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares taking two blood thinners for just 1 month versus the standard 12 months after getting a heart stent. It involves over 3,700 patients with acute coronary syndrome. The goal is to see if the shorter regimen reduces bleeding risks without increasing heart problems.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- ticagrelor and aspirin
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a shorter course of blood thinners after stenting is just as safe and effective, reducing bleeding risks for heart patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a large trial but still testing a shorter treatment duration; it may not prove non-inferiority, and individual patient risks vary. Bleeding or clotting events could still occur.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Nanjing First Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Software-Guided heart procedures: a new standard for coronary care?
- Heart patients may stay active longer with coach calls and group support
- Sitting less could be a lifeline for frail hearts – a new trial tests a simple program
- Can balloon timing make or break heart artery success?
- Ultrasound 'Memory' imaging may reveal hidden heart ischemia
- Can we predict which heart aneurysms will grow?