Laser beats shockwave for neck pain in new study
NCT ID NCT07593781
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two non-invasive treatments for neck muscle pain in 50 adults. One group received shockwave therapy, the other low-level laser therapy, both once a week for three weeks. Laser therapy led to greater pain reduction and improved neck movement at the three-week mark.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy
- What this could lead to
- If this works, it could help doctors choose the best non-invasive treatment for neck muscle pain.
- What could go wrong
- This was a small, completed trial with only 50 participants. Results may not apply to everyone, and longer-term effects are unknown.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
50 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2024
- Finished
-
Sep 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 59 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * men and women * aged 18 to 59 years old * sedentary activity level * active MTrP on the upper trapezius muscle * moderate pain with an NRS pain score of 4-7 * restriction of ROM * CVA angle of ≤ 50° * All agreed to participate in this study with informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * patients who were unable to complete the assessment or communicate adequately based on the Indonesian version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-Ina) * experiencing neck pain caused by radicular syndrome proven with the Spurling test, distraction test and Adson test. * history of malignancy * history of blood clotting disorder * receiving anticoagulant therapy * in a emergency state (e.g., loss of consciousness, shortness of breath, active bleeding, seizures, or hyperpyrexia) * pregnant * participants with pacemaker * participants undergoing other treatments (manual therapy, massage, acupuncture, dry needling, or other rehabilitation modalities) for neck pain in the previous two weeks
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Extracorporeal shockwave therapy are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a tiny electric boost make dry needling more powerful for neck pain?
- Can a simple tape unlock relief from muscle pain?
- Kratom patch could ease stubborn neck pain without pills
- Can massage tools beat Hands-On therapy for stubborn neck pain?
- Hands-On or electrotherapy? trial tests two approaches for stubborn neck pain
- Baking soda boost: could a kitchen staple improve pain injections?