Could a tiny electric boost make dry needling more powerful for neck pain?
NCT ID NCT07775144
First seen Aug 20, 2026 · Last updated Aug 21, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial asks whether adding a mild electrical current to dry needling improves outcomes for people with neck pain caused by muscle knots, known as myofascial trigger points. Adults aged 18 to 60 with neck pain lasting at least three weeks will receive either standard dry needling or electrical dry needling once a week for six weeks. Researchers will measure changes in pain intensity, psychological distress (depression, anxiety, stress), and fear of movement to see if the electrical version offers extra benefit.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Dry needling (with or without electrical stimulation)
- What this could lead to
- If electrical dry needling proves superior, it could offer a more effective, non-drug option for easing neck pain and the stress and fear of movement that often come with it.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures involve needles and can cause temporary soreness or bruising.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
34 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2026
- Finished
-
Aug 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18-60 years of either gender. * Neck pain duration ≥ 3 weeks. * Presence of at least one active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, SCM, splenius capitis, or scalenes, confirmed using Travell and Simons' criteria. * Pain intensity ≥ 4 on NPRS (0-10) at baseline. * Ability to understand and complete questionnaires. * Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * History of cervical spine trauma, fracture, or surgery. * Diagnosis of neurological deficits. * Systemic diseases affecting muscles or joints. * Use of anticoagulant therapy or bleeding disorders. * Pregnancy or lactation. * Active infection or skin lesions in the cervical region. * Previous dry needling or electrical dry needling treatment in the past 6 months. * Allergy to needles or local anesthetics if used.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Myofascial pain syndrome - neck are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
The University of Faisalabad
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which neck therapy works better? a Head-to-Head test
- Can diaphragm exercises ease stubborn neck pain?
- Can deep breathing loosen the grip of neck pain?
- Does stretchy tape really soothe knotted neck muscles?
- Can electrical pulses outsmart chronic neck pain?
- Can targeted neck exercises outperform standard stretching?