Which laxative works best for Kids' embarrassing bowel accidents? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07604025

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two laxatives, Senna and polyethylene glycol (PEG), to see which better reduces accidental bowel leakage in children with long-term constipation. About 80 children aged 4 to 18 will take one of the two medicines daily for 3 months, and neither the families nor doctors will know which one is given. The goal is to find a more effective treatment for this common and distressing condition.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Early phase 1

The earliest testing in people: a first look at safety, in a very small group.

Participants

About 80 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jul 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jan 2028

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

4 to 17 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Children aged 4 to 18 years. * Diagnosis of functional constipation according to Rome IV criteria. * Fecal incontinence occurring ≥4 times per week. * Treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced (i.e., any of the following treatments in the past: PEG, senna, bisacodyl and rectal disimpaction) patients. Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of organic disease that causes or contributes to fecal incontinence (e.g., Hirschsprung disease, spinal cord anomalies, anorectal malformations).

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Encopresis with constipation and overflow incontinence are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    2 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Shaare Zedek Medical Center

    Jerusalem, 91031, Israel

  • Shamir Medical Center

    Be’er Ya‘aqov, Israel

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.