Heart valve study: is being awake or asleep better during procedure?
NCT ID NCT04347603
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 218 people with severe aortic stenosis (a narrowed heart valve) who needed a procedure called TAVI to replace the valve without open-heart surgery. Researchers compared two approaches: general anesthesia (being fully asleep) versus local anesthesia with sedation (being awake but relaxed). The goal was to see if general anesthesia was as safe and effective as the lighter sedation method, focusing on complications and recovery within the first 72 hours.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
218 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2020
- Finished
-
Mar 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients over 18 years of age * Consecutive patients referred to the cardiology department of the CHU in Montpellier, France, for TAVI via transfemoral access. * Patients for whom the procedure is indicated after decision by the heart team and according to the current recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology. * Patients with severe aortic stenosis defined by mean gradient \> 40 mmHg and/or aortic valve area 1 cm2 or 0.8 cm2/m2 as recommended. May also include patients with low gradient (\< 40mm hg) and low flow (stroke volume index \< 35ml/minute) which are classic indications for aortic valve replacement * Ability to consent to participate in study * Patient affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security scheme Exclusion Criteria: * Chronic respiratory insufficiency treated by long term oxygeno therapy * Pulmonary hypertension above 50mmHg * BMI\>35 * TAVI by carotidian or apical way * Pregnant women * Vulnerable person according to L1121-6 of Public Health reglementation in France
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Stenoses, aortic are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University hospital
Montpellier, France
-
University hospital
Nîmes, France