Balloon catheter vs. dilators: which works better for Same-Day cervical prep?

NCT ID NCT06799052

First seen Jun 30, 2026 · Last updated Jul 01, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two ways to soften and open the cervix before a second-trimester abortion procedure called dilation and evacuation (D&E). One method uses a small balloon catheter placed through the cervix for a few hours; the other uses synthetic rods that swell as they absorb moisture. The goal is to see if the balloon method works as well as the dilators, focusing on how long the procedure takes, pain, and satisfaction.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Transcervical single-balloon catheter (Foley catheter) and synthetic osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S)
What this could lead to
If the balloon catheter works as well as osmotic dilators, it could offer a simpler, more comfortable option for cervical preparation before a second-trimester abortion.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial with only 32 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The balloon method might not prepare the cervix as effectively, leading to longer or more complicated procedures.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ABORTION, SECOND TRIMESTER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Pain, Procedural Patient Satisfaction

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Boston Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.