Robots vs. surgeons: which gives better knee replacement results?
NCT ID NCT05744895
Summary
This study compared two methods for knee replacement surgery in people with severe knee arthritis. 123 patients had surgery using a robotic assistant (MAKO system), while previous patients had traditional manual surgery. Researchers tracked pain levels, recovery speed, and how accurately the new knee parts were positioned to see if the robotic approach offered advantages.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Washington University School of Medicine
Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141, United States
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.