CT scan helps doctors avoid nerve damage during heart procedure
NCT ID NCT07330791
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 80 people having a heart procedure called ablation to treat irregular heartbeats. Doctors wanted to see if a CT scan could accurately show the location of a nerve near the heart that can be accidentally injured. They compared the CT images with a standard method that uses electrical stimulation to find the nerve. The goal was to make the procedure safer by better understanding the nerve's path.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
80 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2025
- Finished
-
Sep 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
All patients underwent an electrocardiography-gated cardiovascular CT using a 64-slice multidetector row CT scanner (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare Global Diagnostic Imaging) prior to the ablation procedure. The position line was set at 0.5 cm below the tracheal bifurcation to the cardiac diaphragmatic surface. The acquisition was performed within a single breath- hold. The gantry rotation time was 0.35 s, and the tube current was 350-750 mA at 120 kV. Iodinated contrast material (60 mL; Omnipaque 300 mg/mL), was injected at a rate of 4-5 mL/s, followed by 20 mL of saline solution. A second acquisition immediately after is performed to study the venous phase. Original images at 75% or 45% R-R intervals were transferred to post-processing Workstation, with a section thickness of 0.625 mm. If motion artifacts appeared, the electrocardiographic editing technique was used and the reconstructed window was moved forward or backward for 5% R-R interval until the motion artifacts disappeared.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Ability to provide informed consent * Patients who have undergone or will undergo transcatheter AF ablation or CNA * Availability of 64-slice contrast-enhanced MDCT with RPN segmentation using ADAS® software prior to ablation * Age ≥ 18 years Exclusion Criteria: * Inability to provide informed consent * Inability to perform contrast-enhanced CT before transcatheter AF ablation or CNA * Age \< 18 years
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Atrial fibrillation are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Antonio Berruezo
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08022, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- High-resolution Contrast-Enhanced MRI of atrial fibrillation patients prior to FIRM ablation
- Apple watch vs. medical monitor: which better detects hidden heart rhythm problems?
- Can a new ultrasound catheter give doctors a better view inside the heart?
- Can dropping one blood thinner cut bleeding without raising heart risks?
- Hidden heart rhythm problems after stroke: can longer monitoring prevent a second stroke?
- Can a blood test reveal why atrial fibrillation returns after cryoablation?