Which ankle surgery gets athletes back in the game faster?

NCT ID NCT04726566

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study followed 204 people who had ankle surgery for chronic instability. Researchers compared two surgical techniques—tendon graft and suture with biological reinforcement—to see how many returned to their main sport at the same level 10 months later. The goal is to understand which approach works best for getting athletes back to activity.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this study could help doctors choose the best surgical technique for chronic ankle instability to improve return-to-sport rates.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study, not a controlled trial, so results may not prove one surgery is better. It only follows patients for 10 months, so long-term outcomes are unknown.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • European sports rehabilitation center

    Capbreton, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.