A simpler air mattress may prevent bedsores just as well — trial puts it to the test

NCT ID NCT06294327

Completed Prevention Sponsor: Vitaz Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jul 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 28, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two types of air mattresses for preventing pressure ulcers (bedsores) in hospital patients at high risk. One is a reactive static air mattress that stays still, and the other is an alternating air pressure mattress that constantly changes pressure points. Researchers will track how many patients develop bedsores and measure costs and comfort over at least two days in the hospital.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: reactive static air support surfaces (Repose mattress, cushion, wedge, foot protectors) compared to alternating air pressure mattress
What this could lead to: If the simpler static air mattress works as well as the alternating one, hospitals could prevent pressure ulcers more easily and at lower cost.
What could go wrong: This is a single-hospital trial, so results may not apply everywhere. The static mattress may prove less effective for some patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DECUBITUS ULCER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

decubitus ulcer prevention target

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

DECUBITUS ULCER PRESSURE INJURY PRESSURE ULCER

Contacts and locations

Locations

Vitaz (General Hospital)

Sint-Niklaas, East Flanders, 9100, Belgium

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.