Which score saves lives? new study tests REMS vs NEWS2 for sepsis
NCT ID NCT07171918
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 130 adults with suspected sepsis in an emergency department. Researchers compared two scoring systems—REMS and NEWS2—to see which one better predicts how sick a patient will become, including need for ICU care, ventilator use, and risk of death. The goal is to find a simple tool that helps doctors act faster and save lives.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If REMS proves more accurate than NEWS2, it could help doctors quickly identify the sickest sepsis patients and improve early treatment decisions.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center observational study, not a treatment trial. The results may not apply to other hospitals or change current practice.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEPSIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Department of Emergency Medicine, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute
Thrissur, India
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can we optimize antibiotic dosing for children with sepsis?
- Could starting feeds sooner shield preterm babies from infection?
- Can brain waves predict thinking problems after sepsis?
- Can tailored nutrition boost recovery in the ICU?
- Blood markers may foretell brain fog after sepsis
- A hidden clue in the fingertips: could a pulse oximeter reading forecast sepsis outcomes?