Can a better hazmat suit keep first responders safer and more effective?

NCT ID NCT07726537

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Medical University of Graz Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jul 24, 2026 · Last updated Jul 24, 2026

Summary

This pilot study compares two types of Category III protective suits worn by first responders during simulated disaster-response tasks. Twelve healthy adults will perform exercises at two different temperatures while wearing each suit. Researchers will measure heart rate, body temperature, reaction time, and comfort to find the best balance between protection and performance.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Category III PPE suits (COMAT and EBO-10)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could help design better protective gear and biosensor systems for first responders facing biological hazards.
What could go wrong: This is a small pilot study with only 12 participants, so results may not apply broadly. The focus is on ergonomics and monitoring, not on testing protection against actual hazards.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEALTHY ADULT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

HEALTHY ADULT

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Study contacts

Contact

Email: •••••@•••••
Contact

Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

Medical University of Graz
RECRUITING

Graz, Styria, 8010, Austria

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.