Gum recession showdown: pinhole vs tunnel technique
NCT ID NCT04513041
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two surgical techniques to treat receding gums: the pinhole technique and the tunnel technique. 21 adults with gum recession received both procedures on different teeth. The goal was to see which method better covered exposed roots and increased gum thickness after 6 months.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GINGIVAL RECESSION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A new twist on gum surgery could better cover exposed roots
- Gum graft boost: growth factors may strengthen receding gum repair
- Micro-needling vs. gum graft: a tiny trial tests a simpler fix for receding gums
- Can a strip of your own gum plus donor tissue rebuild healthier gums?
- Tooth fillings before gum surgery may boost root coverage for receding gums
- Gum graft surgery may beat cleaning alone for receding gums