Simple needle puncture may replace scalpel for pilonidal abscesses

NCT ID NCT06378918

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two ways to drain a pilonidal abscess: a simple needle puncture (aspiration) versus the standard incision. The goal was to see if puncture leads to faster healing, lower cost, and less time off work. Only 5 adults took part before the trial was stopped early, so the results are not conclusive.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

puncture (aspiration) with local anesthesia and antibiotic coverage

What this could lead to

If puncture works as well as incision, it could offer a simpler, faster-healing option for draining pilonidal abscesses without general anesthesia.

What could go wrong

This trial was terminated with only 5 participants, so results are very limited. Puncture may not fully drain the abscess, leading to higher recurrence or need for additional procedures.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PILONIDAL CYST are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pilonidal sinus Surgical Wound

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU Angers

    Angers, 49000, France