Mesh or no mesh? new study tests safer surgery for prolapse
NCT ID NCT07306715
First seen Jan 04, 2026 · Last updated May 04, 2026 · Updated 17 times
Summary
This study compares two types of laparoscopic pectopexy surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy. One method uses a mesh to support the vagina, while the other does not. The goal is to see which approach leads to fewer relapses and better quality of life, with fewer complications. The study will enroll 60 women aged 40-80 who have symptomatic uterine prolapse and do not wish to keep their uterus.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GENITAL PROLAPSE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Kocaeli University, School of Medicine
RECRUITINGKöseköy, Kocaeli, 41380, Turkey (Türkiye)
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.