Mesh or no mesh? new study tests safer surgery for prolapse
NCT ID NCT07306715
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two types of laparoscopic pectopexy surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy. One method uses a mesh to support the vagina, while the other does not. The goal is to see which approach leads to fewer relapses and better quality of life, while avoiding mesh-related complications. About 60 women aged 40-80 will take part.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GENITAL PROLAPSE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Kocaeli University, School of Medicine
RECRUITINGKöseköy, Kocaeli, 41380, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A virtual coach for surgery: can it empower latina patients?
- Could less gas in the belly mean less pain after pelvic surgery?
- Can a Blood-Derived injection strengthen pelvic floor repair?
- One surgery, two problems? a new approach to pelvic floor repair
- Can a new mesh implant fix pelvic organ prolapse better?
- Phone call before a bladder test may ease anxiety and improve results