CPAP-Free sleep solutions: mouth device vs. nerve implant showdown

NCT ID NCT07074288

Recruiting now Disease control Sponsor: Washington University School of Medicine Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two alternative treatments for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea in people who cannot use a CPAP machine: a custom mouthpiece (mandibular advancement device) and a surgically implanted nerve stimulator (hypoglossal nerve stimulation). Researchers will track sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, side effects, and patient satisfaction over time. The goal is to help patients and doctors choose the best non-CPAP option.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Study contacts

Contact

Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Contact

Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

Washington University
RECRUITING

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••