Please sign in to follow a disease.
New pacing technique may shield heart from damage in block patients
NCT ID NCT04624763
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests if a newer pacing method called left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is better than standard right ventricular pacing (RVP) at preserving heart function in 683 adults with atrioventricular block (a type of heart block). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two pacing methods and followed for at least 3 years. The goal is to see if LBBP reduces the risk of death, heart failure, or pacing-related heart damage.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 683 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jun 2021
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Indication of permanent pacemaker implantation: (1) Second degree or complete AV block; (2) Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation with mean ventricular rate \< 50 bpm and related symptoms 2. LVEF \> 35%, NYHA classification I-III 3. Age \> 18 years 4. Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Implanted prosthetic tricuspid valve 2. Unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, CABG or PCI within the last 3 months 3. Cardiac surgery like valvular replacement, TAVI, ventricular septal myectomy or ablation within the last 3 months 4. Enrolled in any other study 5. A life expectancy of less than 12 months or unable to undergo the planned 6. follow-up for any reasons 6. Pregnant or with a child-bearing plan 7. A history of heart transplantation 8. Complex congenital heart disease (whether surgical correction or not) and post-surgery repair or post-closure of ventricular septal defect 9. Ventricular septal hypertrophy (≥ 15mm during diastole) 10. Isolated persistent left superior vena cava 11. With ICD, CRT or CRTD indications 12. Pacemaker replacement, upgrade and pocket infection needing re-implantation
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Atrioventricular block are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which pacing target keeps the heart stronger? a trial aims to find out
- Can a pacemaker slip in through the neck vein?
- Can a smarter pacemaker lead placement spare the heart after surgery?
- Could a pacemaker also treat high blood pressure? a new device aims to do both.
- Could a pacemaker tame stubborn high blood pressure?
- Freezing or burning heart nerves: which works best for slow heartbeat?