Can fewer radiation sessions be safer for lung cancer?

NCT ID NCT07777614

First seen Aug 20, 2026 · Last updated Aug 21, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial is testing two different radiation schedules for people with peripheral lung cancer or a single lung metastasis. One group receives the standard five-session treatment, while the other gets an experimental three-session approach. The goal is to see if the shorter schedule causes fewer severe side effects while still controlling the tumor. The study includes adults with inoperable tumors who are fit enough for treatment.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Image-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) given in either 3 or 5 sessions
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help tailor radiation dosing for lung cancer, reducing side effects while maintaining tumor control.
What could go wrong
This is a phase 2 trial, so results are preliminary. The shorter 3-fraction schedule might not be as safe or effective as the standard 5-fraction approach.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network (SLRON) at St Luke's Hospital and St James's Hospital

    Dublin, D06 HH36, Ireland

    Contact Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.