Shockwaves vs. Drill-and-Shockwaves: which clears heart blockages better?
NCT ID NCT07000045
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two techniques for treating severely hardened heart arteries: using a special drill (rotational atherectomy) plus shockwave therapy versus shockwave therapy alone. About 120 adults with coronary artery disease will be randomly assigned to one of the two approaches. The goal is to see which method allows for better stent placement and long-term heart health.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mount Sinai Hospital
RECRUITINGNew York, New York, 10029, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Software-Guided heart procedures: a new standard for coronary care?
- Heart patients may stay active longer with coach calls and group support
- Sitting less could be a lifeline for frail hearts – a new trial tests a simple program
- Can balloon timing make or break heart artery success?
- Can we predict which heart aneurysms will grow?
- Can a higher dose of adenosine sharpen heart scans?