Which breathing aid works best after extubation? new study compares NIV and HFNC
NCT ID NCT07630766
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 102 adults in the intensive care unit who were at high risk of needing a breathing tube again after it was removed. Researchers compared two types of breathing support: noninvasive ventilation (a mask that helps push air into the lungs) and high-flow nasal cannula (warm, moist air delivered through the nose). The goal was to see which method better prevents the need to put the breathing tube back in. The study found which approach led to fewer reinsertions and better outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for EXTUBATION FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Benha University Hospital
Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, 13511, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a simple ultrasound predict which newborns breathe on their own?
- A simple cough measurement may help doctors decide when to safely remove a breathing tube
- Could a diaphragm sensor help preemies breathe on their own sooner?
- Warm oxygen through the nose may help brain injury patients breathe easier after ventilator
- Simple swallow check may predict ventilator weaning failure
- New study aims to predict which ICU patients need breathing tubes again