Does a multiport catheter beat a Single-Port for labor pain?

NCT ID NCT01861821

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested whether a flexible catheter with three openings (multiport) provides better pain relief during labor than a standard single-opening catheter. 650 women in labor received one of the two catheters for epidural medication. The goal was to see if the multiport design improves the chance of complete pain relief without needing extra doses.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
flexible epidural catheter (multiport or uniport)
What this could lead to
If the multiport catheter works better, it could provide more reliable pain relief during labor and reduce the need for extra interventions.
What could go wrong
This is a completed study comparing two devices, so results are already known. The difference between catheters may be small, and individual responses vary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

650 people

The number who actually took part.

Start date

Nov 2011

Finished

Jun 2013

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 45 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I-III parturients * Mixed parity * Estimated gestational age of at least 37 weeks * Singleton gestation * Cephalic presentation * Spontaneous or induced labor Exclusion Criteria: * Body mass index (BMI) \> 45 kg/m2 * Prior cesarean section * Multiple gestation * Fetal abnormality * Use of chronic analgesic medication * Local anesthetic allergy * Coagulopathy or anticoagulation * Infection at epidural insertion site * Spinal deformity other than mild scoliosis * Uncontrolled/uncompensated/uncorrected cerebral, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, endocrinologic, metabolic, or hematologic condition

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Labor pain are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Labor Pain

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Baylor All Saints Medical Center

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.