Robot or mirror? new study tests best way to recover arm use after stroke

NCT ID NCT07435688

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested two methods to help people regain arm movement after a stroke: looking at a mirror to trick the brain, or using a robotic hand glove that mimics the healthy arm. Thirty adults who had a stroke within the past year took part. Both groups also received standard physical therapy for six weeks. The goal was to see which approach works better for improving motor function and sensation in the affected arm.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
mirror therapy and robotic hand device
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that robotic mirror therapy is more effective than standard mirror therapy for regaining arm and hand function after a stroke.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed trial with only 30 participants, so results may not apply to all stroke survivors. The interventions are for symptom improvement, not a cure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

30 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2024

Finished

Dec 2024

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Having a ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke diagnosis through MRI and/or CT * Volunteering to enter the study * First ever stroke or no sequeale (mRS 0) * Being in subacute/chronic phase of stroke (between 1st week to 1 year) * Having a adequate sitting balance or able to maintain upright sitting position for 30 minutes * Having a motor deficit in the hand (Brunnstrom hand motor recovery stages 1-4 ) * Having a full range of motion in hand Exclusion Criteria: * Severe Pain (VAS ≥ 8) * Having a neurological or orthopedic problem in hand * Severe spatial hemineglect (NIHSS 11th subscale\> 1) * Spasticity (mAS ≥ 2) * Apraxia * Visual/auditory loss that affects treatment * Unstable Vital Signs

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cva (cerebrovascular accident) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Alkent 2000, 34500 Büyükçekmece/İstanbul

    Istanbul, Istanbul, 34500, Turkey (Türkiye)

  • Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa

    Istanbul, Büyükcekmece, 34500, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.