Magnetic heart signals could help ER doctors spot hidden heart risk
NCT ID NCT07822581
First seen Sep 16, 2026 · Last updated Sep 17, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
Researchers are testing whether a non-invasive device that reads the heart's magnetic signals can help emergency department doctors tell high-risk from low-risk chest pain. The study enrolls adults 22 and older who arrive with symptoms suggesting a possible heart attack and who fall into a moderate-risk group based on a standard scoring tool. Participants receive a magnetocardiography scan alongside their usual care, and researchers use the collected signals and clinical data to train machine learning algorithms to detect high-risk coronary artery disease.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Magnetocardiography using the SandboxAQ CardiAQ System, a non-invasive device that measures the heart's magnetic signals
- What this could lead to
- If it works, emergency doctors could get a faster, non-invasive way to spot which chest pain patients face high risk of coronary artery disease, helping them decide who needs urgent care.
- What could go wrong
- This is a data-collection study to train computer algorithms, not a test of whether the approach improves patient outcomes. The magnetic signals may not reliably separate high-risk from low-risk patients, and the algorithms could fail to work in real emergency settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 200 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Sep 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Mar 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Adult patients in the ED presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndromes, with a HEART Score of 4 or above, and after the first ECG and troponin results have been obtained to rule-out STEMI or obvious non-ACS are potential candidates for this study. This represents the "grey-zone", suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patient population that is time-consuming to triage and often creates a bottleneck in the ED.
- Ages
-
22 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Women and men aged 22 years and older * Participant presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of NSTE-ACS * In ED chest pain/NSTE-ACS care pathway * HEART Score 4+ * Have received their first troponin result and can accommodate an MCG scan before the second troponin result. Exclusion Criteria: * Unable to provide informed consent * ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) * Active arrhythmia (as seen on the most recent ECG) such as atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular tachycardia * Acute hemodynamic instability * Inability to lie supine and still for 5-10 minutes * Known or suspected pregnancy * Unable or unwilling to comply with required follow-up * Metallic passive implants that would make the participant unsuitable for MCG (e.g. spinal implants, metal shoulder replacements, dental implants.. etc.) * Active implantable medical devices (e.g. pacemakers, neurostimulators.. etc.) * Active illegal drug use per history of present illness * Contraindicated for temporary removal of telemetry during MCG scan * Clear non-ischemic cause for symptoms (e.g. trauma, viral infection, valve disease) * Clinical conditions that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the participant or ability to complete the protocol (e.g., exceeds bed weight limit, allergy to adhesives)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The study's own enquiry address
This study publishes an address for enquiries. See it below .
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
UCSF - Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- The heart rhythm threat hiding in heart attack wards
- Heart arteries without metal: CT scans track Drug-Coated balloon results
- Can a Drug-Coated balloon beat a stent for tough heart attacks?
- A quick scoring tool may help emergency call centers spot the most dangerous chest pain cases
- Can a Triple-Drug cholesterol blitz make heart plaques safer?
- A 15-Minute audio break: could guided imagery soothe heart patients?