Ultrasound by novices may replace X-Ray for pneumothorax detection

NCT ID NCT06022081

First seen Jan 11, 2026 · Last updated Jun 23, 2026 · Updated 33 times

Summary

This study compares lung ultrasound performed by medical trainees to standard chest X-rays for detecting pneumothorax (collapsed lung) after chest tube removal in heart surgery and trauma patients. Researchers will enroll 60 adults to see if the ultrasound method is accurate and practical. If it works, it could offer a safer, faster, and less painful way to diagnose this serious condition.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PNEUMOTHORAX are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

lung ultrasound

What this could lead to

If successful, this could show that lung ultrasound performed by trainees is a reliable, safer, and less painful alternative to chest X-rays for detecting pneumothorax after chest tube removal.

What could go wrong

This is a small pilot study (60 participants) focused on feasibility, not yet proving accuracy. Results may not apply to all patients or settings, and novice operators may miss signs.

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pneumothorax

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.