Minimally invasive surgery vs. open surgery for cervical cancer: which is better?

NCT ID NCT07626996

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two surgical approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: laparoscopic-assisted (minimally invasive) and open abdominal hysterectomy. Sixty women with stage IA1 to IB1 cervical cancer were randomly assigned to one of the two surgeries. Researchers measured surgery time, blood loss, hospital stay, and cancer recurrence over three years to see which method is safer and more effective.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy (minimally invasive surgery) vs open radical hysterectomy
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that laparoscopic surgery is as safe and effective as open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer, with shorter recovery and fewer complications.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study with only 60 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. Long-term outcomes like recurrence are still being tracked, and laparoscopic surgery may have a learning curve for surgeons.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CERVICAL CANCER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

cervical cancer cervical carcinoma Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Zagazig University Hospitals

    Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.