Keyhole vs. open surgery: which is better for hysterectomy in Low-Resource areas?

NCT ID NCT07496814

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares laparoscopic (keyhole) hysterectomy to traditional open abdominal hysterectomy in women aged 35-65 with benign gynecologic conditions. The main goal is to see which approach leads to a shorter hospital stay. The trial takes place in a low-resource setting, where equipment and training may be limited.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

surgical procedure (laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could show that laparoscopic hysterectomy is feasible and beneficial even in low-resource settings, guiding surgical choices.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage study with only 32 participants, so results may not apply broadly. Equipment or skill shortages could limit real-world use.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BENIGN GYNECOLOGIC CONDITIONS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

benign female reproductive system neoplasm

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.